Exercise is commonly seen as a tool to burn off calories and stored body fat. While exercise has potential to greatly increase calorie burn off and fat burning, as seen in elite athletes , studies show that for most people who are struggling with fat loss, dieting – i.e. reducing caloric intake – results in a greater weight loss (or fat loss in some cases) than exercising.[2-5] Why?
The problem is not that exercise is ineffective, but that the prescribed exercise dose or adherence to the prescribed exercise dose, is poor.[4, 6] In most studies, the energy deficit produced by the prescribed exercise is far smaller than that usually produced by dietary restriction. In contrast, in studies that carefully compared the effects of an equal energy deficit caused by either aerobic exercise versus caloric restriction, the effect on weight loss is similar.[7-10]
In these studies, subjects achieved an identical daily energy deficit of 500-700 calories, created either by diet or by supervised daily exercise, for a 12-week period. Similar weight losses (approximately 6 kg in women and 8 kg in men) occurred in both the diet-only and exercise-only groups.[7, 8] Unfortunately, adherence to exercise programs that daily burn 500-700 calories per session is low and over half end up dropping out after 16 months, despite getting paid for their time.[11, 12] But this does not mean that lower amounts of exercise are “worthless”. Here I will tell you how regular exercising – even if your workouts don’t result in large calorie expenditures – helps you stay on the fitness track…
What about those people who struggle with adhering to exercise programs and have a hard time completing workouts that burn 500-700 calories? Are their efforts worthless? No! Even a lower amount of exercise that doesn’t result in weight loss provides health benefits.[13, 14] Another important benefit, which is relatively unknown, is that aerobic exercise improve the coupling between calorie intake and energy expenditure; in other words, habitual physical activity improves spontaneous appetite control by enhancing satiety signaling, which automatically adjusts food intake to match expenditure.[15-20]
In contrast, physical inactivity disrupts appetite control, which could contributes to ingestion of more calories than what is expended, and over time fat gain, unless conscious effort is made to restrict caloric intake to match a low energy expenditure.[21-24]
Evidence that physical inactivity disrupts appetite control comes from a study which assessed the effect of an imposed sedentary routine on energy intake. It was found that a sedentary routine does not induce a compensatory reduction in caloric intake and leads to a significantly positive energy balance (i.e. a state where caloric intake exceeds expenditure), most of which is stored as body fat.
WORKING OUT: RIPPLE EFFECTS
In addition to improved spontaneous appetite control, regular exercise has numerous beneficial psychological effects that support long-term fat loss and health promotion.[25-31] It is well-documented that regular exercise Improves self-efficacy (belief in one’s ability to accomplish a task), body image, and mood, which may result in stronger motivation and confidence, which would in turn improve eating self- control, leading to better dietary compliance (as well as long-term exercise adherence).[25, 26] Improvements in self-efficacy for exercise appears to carry over to improvements in controlled eating because of a generalization of feelings of ability to manage an array of choices and behaviors that are conductive to fat loss and health promotion. This in turn leads to feelings of accomplishment (i.e. self-efficacy) and improved mood, which leads to a psychological climate in which individuals have more cognitive and emotional resources, as well as motivation and energy, to persist in a long-term commitment to a fat loss and fitness enhancing program.[25, 32]
Specifically, success in adopting an exercise plan may increase confidence, internal locus of control (i.e. the feeling that one is in control of one’s actions and has free will) and the overall motivational drive toward other behaviors involved in fat loss and maintenance, such as restricting highly processed calorie-dense/nutrient-poor foods, alcoholic beverages, and self-monitoring.
In other words, self-control resources seems to be shared and transferable between health/fitness-related behaviors. This “motivational carry-over” or ripple effect induced by successful adoption of an exercise plan would make adherence to healthy eating and an overall healthy fitness promoting lifestyle easier. Several studies have demonstrated that behavioral interventions (such as adoption of an exercise training program) have spill over – ripple effects – beyond their intended primary target (in this case, an increased exercise participation).
A notable study showed that exercise motivation and exercise self-control is associated with several important markers of eating self-control, and that the psychological effects of sticking to an exercise plan “spilled-over“ and contributed to improved eating behavior. This is in accordance with other studies suggesting that physical activity is a gateway behavior for improved eating control, and the existence of an interactive and reinforcing interaction between habitual exercise and healthy eating.[30, 34-38] In addition, sticking to a training program builds not just physical strength but also cognitive resources, especially inhibitory control, which are necessary to block impulsive actions that may have adverse health consequences, such as over-eating.
Although the relationship between exercise program participation and fat loss is strong [26,32,39], less than half of the weight (fat) loss among obese people seems to be attributable to exercise induced calorie burn off.[32, 40] This suggests that the association of exercise program participation with weight loss in obese and unconditioned individuals is associated more with changes in psycho-social variables than caloric expenditure. Considering these ripple effects, it is not surprising that regular exercise is a “potent factor“ for long-term fat loss , and the strongest predictor of successful fat loss maintenance , even though it may not be directly (or solely) due to its calorie burn off effect.
Figure 1 illustrates the psychological pathways linking exercise and weight control (or fat loss).
Figure 1: Psychological pathways linking exercise and weight control.
Figure from Annesi, J.J., Supported exercise improves controlled eating and weight through its effects on psychosocial factors: extending a systematic research program toward treatment development. Perm J, 2012. 16(1): p. 7-18
GET ON A TRAINING PROGRAM
An interesting study interviewed people in real life (as opposed to subjects in a controlled study) about their weight loss experiences. Among those who exercised regularly, exercise reinforced dietary behaviors, and either prompted them to maintain dietary compliance, or was an underlying factor that made them eat for fat-loss purposes. For everybody who undertook exercise as part of their “get in shape journeys“, exercise was felt to add structure and re-affirm daily fitness behaviors.
A few of quotes from this study – in people’s own words – makes the point clear: 
• “If I exercise I eat better. If I don’t exercise I eat worse.”
• “For me I think if I’m exercising three or four times a week, that punctuates a reminder to stay on track and eat clean or eat healthy and make appropriate choices.”
• “My thinking is if I go out for a run, which I enjoy doing, and I eat badly, I’ve ruined that hour that I’ve spent going out for a run. You know, I’ve wasted that hour, whereas if I go out for a run and eat properly that hour of going out and running has been productive.”
• “Even times where you’re not feeling great because you’ve eaten too much or you’re not too happy with the way your weight is… if the gym’s going well at least that’s something that you’re able to do.”
Most of the participants stated that structure was a key component of their weight loss, linking it to their perception of control: 
• “Being in control is something I’m enjoying, and having structure is important.”
Participants felt that creating structures by being organized and developing routines allowed them to manage their behaviors in the context of their environments, so that appropriate food was avail able when needed, that meal plans were predetermined and adherent to their objectives. For some, this was clearly defined and tangible:
• “I find that I work better with things written down and things to follow. So that’s probably why I find it easier to work within certain calories, because I know that’s how many calories I’m supposed to be having.”
Others stated that they had a less tangible structure, but that they recognized that routine was important to their successes:
• “I have a loose plan in place definitely. It’s a plan that I’ve fallen into I suppose through routine. I definitely know when I’m out of that routine.”
MAKE IT FUN INSTEAD OF A “MUST”
Exercise and physical activity can be an inherently rewarding activities that contributes to both health, vitality and well-being.[44-47] By filling a psychological need of competence and enjoyment, adherence to physical activity may affirm and promote other healthy behaviors. The key is to find reasons to 4 exercise that are internally rewarding (such as enjoyment and health promotion), as opposed to externally imposed (such as weight loss pressured by a desire to please culturally set ideals). [44, 47-50]
Instead of asking “what is the best exercise for fat loss?” ask yourself “what exercise(s) do I enjoy most?” For example, many people are dreading long-duration cardio. Why not try HIIT (high intensity interval training)? A recent study found that HIIT elicits higher enjoyment than moderate intensity continuous (long duration) exercise, due to HIIT being time efficient and providing a constantly changing stimulus. Try different activities and find those you like; then you can start to think about which may be most effective in physiological terms. Because even the most effective exercise program won’t do you any good unless you stick to it long-term.
In today’s environment that encourages sedentary behavior and over-eating of processed nutrient poor foods that are packed with empty calories, adhering to an exercise training program and healthy eating requires self-control and determination. Getting in shape and staying in shape in the modern obesogenic environment demands us to rely more on our intellect than our instincts.
Exercising is not just to burn calories. It increase satiety signaling and improves appetite regulation, and has psychological effects that makes it easier for you to pick up and stick to healthy eating. By adding daily structure and acting as a reminder, regular working out helps you stay on track with your overall fitness lifestyle. In this sense, physical activity is a “gateway behavior” for an upward spiral towards your fitness and health goal(s).
The use of manageable amounts of exercise to build mental strength, self-regulatory skills, competence, and mood improvements that promote a newfound sense of control over eating might prove to become a widespread solution to the longstanding epidemic of obesity and notorious struggle with losing excess body fat and keeping it off.
Monica Mollica holds a Master Degree in Nutrition from the University of Stockholm and Karolinska Institue, Sweden. She has also done PhD level course work at renowned Baylor University, TX.
Monica is a medical writer and clinical website developer. Being a fitness athlete herself, she is also sharing her hands-on experience by offering nutrition & health consultations, and body transformation coaching.
Having lost her father in a lifestyle-induced sudden heart attack at an age of 48, she is very passionate about health promotion and specializes in preventive medicine.
Monica is currently in the process of writing a book on testosterone, covering health related issues for both men and women. You can visit her website at www.Lean.Fitness.
You can follow Monica here:
References: 1. Saris, W.H., et al., Study on food intake and energy expenditure during extreme sustained exercise: the Tour de France. Int J Sports Med, 1989. 10 Suppl 1: p. S26-31.
2. Washburn, R.A., et al., Does the method of weight loss effect long-term changes in weight, body composition or chronic disease risk factors in overweight or obese adults? A systematic review.PLoS One, 2014. 9(10): p. e109849.
3. Johns, D.J., et al., Diet or exercise interventions vs combined behavioral weight management programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of direct comparisons. J Acad Nutr Diet, 2014. 114(10): p. 1557-68.
4. Catenacci, V.A. and H.R. Wyatt, The role of physical activity in producing and maintaining weight loss. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab, 2007. 3(7): p. 518-29.
5. Skender, M.L., et al., Comparison of 2-year weight loss trends in behavioral treatments of obesity: diet, exercise, and combination interventions. J Am Diet Assoc, 1996. 96(4): p. 342-6.
6. Thomas, D.M., et al., Why do individuals not lose more weight from an exercise intervention at a defined dose? An energy balance analysis. Obes Rev, 2012. 13(10): p. 835-47.
7. Ross, R., et al., Exercise-induced reduction in obesity and insulin resistance in women: a randomized controlled trial. Obes Res, 2004. 12(5): p. 789-98.
8. Ross, R., et al., Reduction in obesity and related comorbid conditions after diet-induced weight loss or exercise-induced weight loss in men. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med, 2000. 133(2): p. 92-103.
9. Slentz, C.A., et al., Effects of the amount of exercise on body weight, body composition, and measures of central obesity: STRRIDE–a randomized controlled study. Arch Intern Med, 2004. 164(1): p. 31-9.
10. Slentz, C.A., et al., Inactivity, exercise, and visceral fat. STRRIDE: a randomized, controlled study of exercise intensity and amount. J Appl Physiol (1985), 2005. 99(4): p. 1613-8.
11. Donnelly, J.E., et al., Effects of a 16-month randomized controlled exercise trial on body weight and composition in young, overweight men and women: the Midwest Exercise Trial. Arch Intern Med, 2003. 163(11): p. 1343-50.
12. Donnelly, J.E. and B.K. Smith, Is exercise effective for weight loss with ad libitum diet? Energy balance, compensation, and gender differences. Exerc Sport Sci Rev, 2005. 33(4): p. 169-74.
13. Ross, R. and A.J. Bradshaw, The future of obesity reduction: beyond weight loss. Nat Rev Endocrinol, 2009. 5(6): p. 319-25.
14. Shaw, K., et al., Exercise for overweight or obesity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2006(4): p. CD003817.
15. Martins, C., et al., The effects of exercise-induced weight loss on appetite-related peptides and motivation to eat. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2010. 95(4): p. 1609-16.
16. Long, S.J., K. Hart, and L.M. Morgan, The ability of habitual exercise to influence appetite and food intake in response to high- and low-energy preloads in man. Br J Nutr, 2002. 87(5): p. 517-23.
17. Martins, C., H. Truby, and L.M. Morgan, Short-term appetite control in response to a 6-week exercise programme in sedentary volunteers. Br J Nutr, 2007. 98(4): p. 834-42.
18. King, N.A., et al., Dual-process action of exercise on appetite control: increase in orexigenic drive but improvement in meal-induced satiety. Am J Clin Nutr, 2009. 90(4): p. 921-7.
19. Martins, C., et al., Effect of chronic exercise on appetite control in overweight and obese individuals. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2013. 45(5): p. 805-12.
20. Beaulieu, K., et al., Does Habitual Physical Activity Increase the Sensitivity of the Appetite Control System? A Systematic Review. Sports Med, 2016. 46(12): p. 1897-1919.
21. Mayer, J., P. Roy, and K.P. Mitra, Relation between caloric intake, body weight, and physical work: studies in an industrial male population in West Bengal. Am J Clin Nutr, 1956. 4(2): p. 169-75.
22. King, N.A., A. Tremblay, and J.E. Blundell, Effects of exercise on appetite control: implications for energy balance. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 1997. 29(8): p. 1076-89.
23. Stubbs, R.J., et al., A decrease in physical activity affects appetite, energy, and nutrient balance in lean men feeding ad libitum. Am J Clin Nutr, 2004. 79(1): p. 62-9.
24. Shook, R.P., et al., Low levels of physical activity are associated with dysregulation of energy intake and fat mass gain over 1 year. Am J Clin Nutr, 2015. 102(6): p. 1332-8.
25. Baker, C.W. and K.D. Brownell, Physical activity and maintenance of weight loss: Physiological and psychological mechanisms, in Physical Activity and Obesity, C. Bouchard, Editor. 2000. p. 311–328.
26. Annesi, J.J. and J.L. Unruh, Relations of exercise, self-appraisal, mood changes and weight loss in obese women: testing propositions based on Baker and Brownell’s (2000) model. Am J Med Sci, 2008. 335(3): p. 198-204.
27. Mata, J., et al., Motivational “spill-over” during weight control: increased self-determination and exercise intrinsic motivation predict eating self-regulation. Health Psychol, 2009.
28(6): p. 709-16.28. Annesi, J.J. and C.N. Marti, Path analysis of exercise treatment-induced changes in psychologicalfactors leading to weight loss. Psychol Health, 2011. 26(8): p. 1081-98.
29. Joseph, R.J., et al., The neurocognitive connection between physical activity and eating behaviour. Obes Rev, 2011. 12(10): p. 800-12.
30. Annesi, J.J. and K.J. Porter, Behavioural support of a proposed neurocognitive connection between physical activity and improved eating behaviour in obese women. Obes Res Clin Pract, 2014. 8(4): p. e325-30.
31. Annesi, J.J. and A.C. Whitaker, Weight loss and psychologic gain in obese women-participants in a supported exercise intervention. Perm J, 2008. 12(3): p. 36-45.
32. Annesi, J.J., Supported exercise improves controlled eating and weight through its effects on psychosocial factors: extending a systematic research program toward treatment development.Perm J, 2012. 16(1): p. 7-18.
33. Wilson, D.K., Behavior matters: the relevance, impact, and reach of behavioral medicine. Ann Behav Med, 2015. 49(1): p. 40-8.
34. Blakely, F., et al., Moderate physical activity and its relationship to select measures of a healthy diet. J Rural Health, 2004. 20(2): p. 160-5.
35. Tucker, M. and M. Reicks, Exercise as a gateway behavior for healthful eating among olderadults: an exploratory study. J Nutr Educ Behav, 2002. 34 Suppl 1: p. S14-9.
36. Johnson, N.A., C.A. Boyle, and R.F. Heller, Leisure-time physical activity and other health behaviours: are they related? Australian Journal of Public Health, 1995. 19(1): p. 69-75.
37. Costakis, C.E., T. Dunnagan, and G. Haynes, The Relationship between the Stages of Exercise Adoption and other Health Behaviors. American Journal of Health Promotion, 1999. 14(1): p. 22-30.
38. Marcus, B.H., et al., The stages and processes of exercise adoption and maintenance in a worksite sample. Health Psychol, 1992. 11(6): p. 386-95.
39. Annesi, J.J. and S. Gorjala, Relations of self-regulation and self-efficacy for exercise and eating and BMI change: A field investigation. Biopsychosoc Med, 2010. 4: p. 10.
40. Annesi, J.J., Behaviorally supported exercise predicts weight loss in obese adults through improvements in mood, self-efficacy, and self-regulation, rather than by caloric expenditure.Perm J, 2011. 15(1): p. 23-7.
41. Mann, T., et al., Medicare’s search for effective obesity treatments: diets are not the answer. Am Psychol, 2007. 62(3): p. 220-33.
42. Fogelholm, M. and K. Kukkonen-Harjula, Does physical activity prevent weight gain–a systematic review. Obes Rev, 2000. 1(2): p. 95-111.
43. Rogerson, D., H. Soltani, and R. Copeland, The weight-loss experience: a qualitative exploration.BMC Public Health, 2016. 16: p. 371.
44. Ryan, R.M., et al., Intrinsic motivation and exercise adherence. Int J Sport Psychol 1997. 28: p. 335–354.
45. Silva, M.N., et al., A randomized controlled trial to evaluate self-determination theory for exercise adherence and weight control: rationale and intervention description. BMC Public Health, 2008. 8: p. 234.
46. Gaitan-Sierra, C. and M. Dempster, Choosing to engage and choosing to persist: The role of non-specific factors in health-promoting activities. Br J Health Psychol, 2016. 21(3): p. 515-32.
47. Wilson, P.M., D.E. Mach, and K.P. Grattan, Understanding Motivation for Exercise: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Canadian Psychol, 2008. 49(3): p. 250-256.
48. Edmunds, J., N. Ntoumanis, and J.L. Duda, A Test of Self-Determination Theory in the Exercise Domain. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2006. 36(9): p. 2240-2265.
49. Teixeira, P.J., et al., Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 2012. 9: p. 78.
50. Elfhag, K. and S. Rössner, Who succeeds in maintaining weight loss? A conceptual review of factors associated with weight loss maintenance and weight regain. Obesity Reviews, 2005. 6(1): p. 67-85.
51. Thum, J.S., et al., High-Intensity Interval Training Elicits Higher Enjoyment than Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise. PLoS One, 2017. 12(1): p. e0166299.
52. Peters, J.C., et al., From instinct to intellect: the challenge of maintaining healthy weight in the modern world. Obes Rev, 2002. 3(2): p. 69-74.
53. Annesi, J.J., et al., Weight Loss and the Prevention of Weight Regain: Evaluation of a Treatment Model of Exercise Self-Regulation Generalizing to Controlled Eating. Perm J, 2016. 20(3): p. 4-17.