In
This Week's Edition |
| |
|
|
|
|
(click
on the article you wish to read) |
Dear
Friend,
This
week, I'd like to introduce a new author for the Tip of
the Week, Mr. Rod Johnson. Today he'll be discussing the
infomercials we're bombarded with on television these days.
Next, Rob Thoburn is back with a 2-part article on a new
training method he's developed - the "Optimal Length"
concept. Finally, it's time for part 3 of Dr. Zimmerman's
excellent 5-part series on personal positivity.
Infomercial Advertising...Are You a Target? |
 |
by
Rod Johnson CPT
Have
you seen an infomercial lately? If you keep late-hours
in front of the tube, chances are you have come face-to-face
with one. They often imitate actual talk shows, well
-- maybe not the Jerry Springer Show.
Infomercials
are a form of advertisement, aimed at selling products
or services to consumers. Many of them come with promises
of guaranteed weight loss to promises of a flatter,
toned mid-section almost overnight. Basically, infomercials
sometimes entice us to believe we will look better
with little to no effort. Despite what we think about
them, they have managed to hook millions of Americans
to shed billions of dollars on products that they
hope will help them achieve their goals.
This
year marks the OFFICIAL 20th anniversary of infomercials.
"The very first infomercial was aired at the
end of September 1984 on Sunday evening at 11pm for
Herbalife. It was a live 90-minute broadcast that
showed huge checks being given on stage at a hotel
to their top distributors, " says Steven Dworman,
a former Infomercial Marketing Report publisher. And,
author of $12 Billion of Inside Marketing Secrets
Discovered through Direct Response Marketing.
Infomercials
received their official start in 1984 when President
Reagan signed the Cable Communications Policy Act
deregulating television. Infomercials are also known
as television commercials, runs in two formats --
long and short. The long format may run about 28 minutes
in length. It conveniently allows more time for marketers
to explain a product or service. Short formats such
as Time Life books or compact disc orders last 2 minutes,
more or less. The same holds true for online and radio
spots.
Although
we celebrate the 20th anniversary of infomercials
on television, they actually began earlier.
“Infomercials have been around since 1948, although
then they were only 5 minutes long. The 28-minute
format that is so popular today, hit its stride in
the mid-80’s,” says Don Cole, Executive
Vice President of Media at Fletcher Martin Ewing.
The
direct response industry is one of the fastest growing
segments of the retailing industry. In 2003, the direct
response industry, which consists of long and short
commercials/infomercials, live home shopping channels,
Internet marketing and radio advertising generated
estimated revenues of $256-billon.
Today,
Americans spend a great deal of money on direct response
products, especially health-related products. Infomercials,
paid-programming, and a form of direct response advertisement
are at the top of their game.
“According
to a recent research consumer spending study, over
57-percent of respondents preferred shopping via infomercials
to traditional retail stores,” published by
Electronic Retailing Association (ERA), the trade
association for major companies who use the power
of electronic media to sell goods and services to
the public.
The cost of many of these products might appear inexpensive
to some, but in reality, consumers shell out five
to six times their worth. In a report by Justin Leonard,
The Story of how Infomercials Companies “Really”
Get Paid, he describes the costs associated with the
production of an infomercial. “It’s very
expensive to sell products on TV. Most infomercial
companies won’t accept a product unless there’s
a 5:1 profit margin. In other words, a product that
is sold on TV for $19.95 had better cost only $4 or
less to make.”
“Get
rock hard abs in just two minutes a day,” “cure-all,”
or “take it off and keep it off.”
If
any of these ad-phases sound familiar, they are commonplace
today. Slick marketers use words to get consumers
to believe into the hype. Most of these misleading
or false claims are often seen in weight loss advertising
followed by consumer testimonials, i.e. “I lost
70 pounds in 30 days,” along with before and
after photos.
Infomercials
have become a great mainstay for companies looking
to promote and sell products.
This multi-billion-dollar business has gained popularity
and notoriety simply by enticing consumers on the
convenience of buying product from watching television,
listening to the radio or by surfing through the web.
However, we all are aware that with convenience -
comes fraud. Although some of the ads we hear and
see might seem believable, they are not!
To
protect consumers from this nightmare, the Federal
Trade Commission, the consumer watchdog, is authorized
to act when it appears that a company’s advertising
is deceptive.
“The
FTC watches the industry very carefully. They have
brought a number of cases for false claims against
the marketers over the past 20 years. However, if
the products don’t do what they say they’re
supposed to do, by law a consumer is protected by
a return policy. It behooves everyone in the industry
to make their product as satisfactory as possible
or they will be flooded by returns,” says Steven
Dworman.
Under
the FTC Trade Communications Act:
- advertising must be truthful and non-deceptive:
- advertisers must have evidence to back up their
claims; and
- advertisements cannot be unfair.
Summary
of FTC suggestions to consumers interested in responding
to an infomercial:
- be skeptical about claims;
- ask for written substantiation made in presentations;
- be cautious about testimonials (they may not reflect
the typical experience of most consumers);
- be aware that “experts” who endorse
a product may be paid by the advertiser;
- not be pressured to buy immediately; and
- check out the company with your local consumer protection
agency, the Better Business Bureau and your state
Attorney General’s office.
More
specifically, the FTC has policies relating to infomercials.
Infomercial advertisers must have proof to back up
all expressed and implied claims that reasonable consumers
would take from an ad. Advertisers should make sure
that the infomercial doesn’t deceptively mimic
the format of news reports, talk shows, or other independent
programming.
The FTC cases have required companies to clearly disclose
the program being watched is a paid advertisement.
These advertisements must include the product name
listed at the beginning of the infomercial and prior
to providing consumers with product ordering instructions.
The
FTC is not alone in their pursuit to ensure infomercials
on the straight and narrow. The ERA works closely
with the government agency, most importantly, marketers
of infomercials. Although they are different, “we
[the ERA] are trying to get the marketers to see the
product before it hits the market. We try to do it
quickly to get bad shows off the air,” said
Barbara Tulipane, ERA President and CEO. Direct Response
Marketing ads generally are “a safe and convenient
way to shop.”
“Infomercials
are wonderful in our market based economy. They allow
bootstrap entrepreneurs to launch their inventions
without the 8 figure budgets that are needed to launch
a package goods brand. And, they don't have to fight
for distribution among the big box retailers. If an
infomercial product clicks, Wal-Mart and Target cheerfully
take it on as most people still will not buy over
the air,” said Cole.
What
should a consumer do to ensure their safety?
This
year, the Electronic Retailing Association launched
“The ERA Self Regulatory Program,” designed
to improve business practices and increase consumer
confidence, by removing unsubstantiated programming
from the airwaves.
“ERA
advocates increased ethical standards in the direct
response industry because not only is it the right
thing to do, but consumer confidence is good for business.
This program was created not only to improve industry
credibility, but also to help companies comply with
existing regulations,” said Tulipane. In
addition, there’s savvyshoppers.org, also produced
by ERA, a web site designed to help consumers report
fraudulent advertising.
Savvy
Shoppers suggest consumers:
- Know there rights
- Protect yourself
- [Know] Who can help
- Shipping
- Returns
- Unordered items
- Card disputes
The
direct response industry grows on average 10 percent
each year. Some anticipated trends include fortune
500 companies to produce long form spots to sell product.
And, consumers will have more convenience at their
fingertips. Credit card account information will be
tied into a button on their TV remote which will help
make home shopping that much easier.
The
bottom line: Infomercials are a convenient way to
buy products fast and with little effort. However,
it’s most important consumers use good judgement,
and common sense first.

Rod
Johnson is a Health Producer for CNN Headline News
in Atlanta, Georgia. He’s also a Fitness Consultant
and Personal Fitness Trainer. For more information
on Rod Johnson visit: www.SealOfFitness.com.
|
The Optimal Length Concept: Part 1 |
 |
by
Robert Thoburn
This
two-part series introduces a new concept in resistance
exercise: The Optimal Length (OL) concept. I’ll
briefly tell you how it came about, and how to put
it to use in your R.O.B. workouts. As many readers
will already now, R.O.B. training is my favorite method
of building muscle and losing body fat quickly, particularly
for the ‘slow gainer’ (like myself).
“Hi
Rob –it’s been about 5 weeks using
Optimal Length training…and I like it.
I'm about 5' 9" tall at 163 lbs - 9-10%
fat and in my 50's. I'm not looking to get a
whole lot bigger - just stay cut-up and maybe
lose [a few pounds]…[OL training] seems
to do it. I'm still adjusting to it mentally
- can't believe I'm out of the gym in under
30 minutes. It is amazin…Thanks again
for the OL training plan - I've shown it to
other people and they all love it - for the
average person that wants to just stay in shape
- I think its perfect - they get the workout
they need and are out of the gym fast -its about
as good as it gets.
Take
Care
Don” |
Force
Push against an object and your muscles will have
generated force. Push as hard as you can against an
object that you can’t possibly move and your
muscles will have generated maximum force (or something
close to it).
Remember the scene in Pumping Iron
where Franco Columbo grabs the end of some old guy’s
car and lifts it away from the curb so he can get
out?
Okay, so maybe you don’t remember
that scene. In any case, if Franco hadn’t been
strong enough to actually lift the car, then his muscles
would have performed a maximal isometric contraction
(MIC) --‘isometric’ because his muscles
didn’t shorten to any appreciable extent as
they generated force (hence his failure to move the
car); ‘maximal’ because they generated
as much force as they could.
More
Force = More Muscle…
…This seems to be the consensus opinion, anyways.
Many well-respected academic research scientists believe
that if you want to make your muscles more buff then
you’ve got to make them generate higher levels
of force than they’re accustomed to. The higher,
the better.
“Cool, man. So then why not
just perform MICs? I mean, why bother actually lifting
weights up and down?”
Good questions. But wait a second.
Muscle
fibers and contraction
The force generated by your muscles is produced by
hair-like cells known as muscle fibers. When you lift
an object, your muscle fibers have generated enough
force to overcome the resistance provided by that
object and undergo shortening, or contraction. Hence,
the object goes up.
Simply
stated, and for reasons beyond the scope of this article,
as your muscle fibers shorten they become less capable
of generating force. Consequently, every muscle on
your body may be argued to have some range of lengths
within which the force-generating ability of its constituent
fibers is greatest, or optimal. This is called the
optimal length. Interestingly, because of joint mechanics
some commonly used resistance exercises (e.g., standing
barbell curls for the biceps) may fail to adequately
stress your muscle fibers within this particular range
of lengths.
“Optimal
length of any human muscle is the one that it
obtains when in the anatomical position; standing
erect, hands at the side, palmar surfaces facing
front. The explanation for this is that
deviations from resting length tend to misalign
actin and myosin crossbridges rendering them
ineffective for producing tension. In
vivo the length-tension relationship is offset
by the mechanical advantage of the levers (bones)
on either side of a joint. For example,
when the elbow joint is fully extended the biceps
muscle is at resting length and thus capable
of maximal tension production. The mechanical
advantage around the joint, however, is poor
because the angle of pull is directly into the
joint. Conversely, when the elbow joint
is flexed to 90 degrees the muscle is shortened
and is therefore on the downward portion of
the length-tension curve. This is offset by
the favorable mechanical advantage of the joint.”
-Dr.
Enzo Cafarelli, York University, from Isometric
Exercise: Physiology and Description
|
Okay,
now let’s re-examine our questions from above.
If higher force levels are better when it comes to
building muscle, then why not make your muscles perform
maximal or near-maximal contractions right around
the optimal length? Why bother performing any contractions
outside of this range, where the ability to transmit
a muscle-building signal may be much reduced, possibly
to zero?
“Rob…Our
own work suggests that it makes no difference
whether you train with a protocol that fatigues
the muscle (i.e., produces large metabolic changes)
or not. Likewise, there are reports that using
eccentric exercise, where the active muscle
is stretched, is the best way of promoting growth,
but again our own results do not support this
view. There is indeed a rapid phase of strength
gain just after eccentric exercise, but this
seems to be associated with repairing damage
and there is little further benefit once the
muscle is repaired.
Isometric
contractions generate higher forces than shortening
contractions and they can last for longer than
contractions involving movement (simply because
you come to the end of the range of motion).
I have always advocated high force isometric
contractions as the best form of training….I
am puzzled that many people prefer to use rapid
movements. The only explanation I have is that
for athletes who are throwing things, it is
important to train the central nervous system
to activate the muscles rapidly at the start
of the contraction. However this does not apply
to body-builders like yourself and I would suggest
that you [incorporate] high-force isometric
contractions [into your training] as you suggest
doing with OL training!”
-Dr.
David Jones, University of Birmingham (personal
communication, 2004)
|
Optimal
Length (OL) Training
When your muscle fibers generate force and pull on
a joint they are said to produce torque around that
joint. The theory behind OL training is to allow the
target muscle fibers to be exercised within that narrow
range of motion (i.e., muscle fiber lengths) that
is optimal for force generation. Note that this range
is not necessarily optimal for torque production.
Quite the contrary, you will often find that you can’t
lift as much weight at the OL. But that’s okay,
because it’s the amount of force generated by
your muscle fibers that’s most important –not
how heavy an external load (i.e., how much weight)
you are actually capable of moving by applying that
force.
I also wish to emphasize that, like most resistance
exercise methods, OL training is based much more on
theory than rigidly scrutinized scientific fact. It
is by no means proven.
The
iHold
In addition to lifting the load through a narrow range
of motion, each rep will carry an isometric component:
The isometric ‘hold’, or iHold, as I call
it (not to be confused with the iPod J).
Let’s look at an example, one
of my favorites, the barbell squat. When your thighs
are just above parallel to the floor during this exercise,
the leverage or mechanical advantage afforded to your
quadriceps muscles by the knee joint is at its lowest.
Consequently, the muscle fibers of the quadriceps
have to generate a lot more force in order to lift
any given load through this point. Fortunately, biological
evolution designed the human skeleton such that most
of the muscle fibers are at a length that is optimal
for force generation at this point. This helps to
make up for the poor mechanical advantage. However,
the compensation is not complete: You still end up
being weaker at this point in the squat exercise than
at any other. Nevertheless, it’s here some scientists
agree, that your potential to transmit a muscle-building
signal may be the greatest.
As you extend your knee joint (i.e.,
straighten your legs) and return to the standing position
during the squat exercise your mechanical advantage
progressively improves: The muscle fibers of your
quadriceps can keep the load moving with less and
less force. Thus, the strength of the muscle-building
signal fades and the load begins to feel lighter.
With
the above in mind, the OL squat is performed as follows:
-
With a loaded barbell across your upper back and shoulders,
squat down until your thighs are parallel to the floor
(going any deeper than this does not increase the
force requirements of the quadriceps).
-
Extend your knees and rise up 5-6 inches or to the
point where you feel the greatest tension develop
in your quadriceps.
-
Perform an iHold (i.e., hold the load in place) at
the point of peak tension for 1 second.
-
Squat back down until your thighs are parallel to
the floor. Repeat.
-
At the end of your set return to the standing position
and rack the barbell.
-
Note that the same basic OL principles used during
the squat can be applied when performing the leg press
and hack squat..
No
MICs?
Why I don’t recommend performing maximal isometric
contractions (MICs)? Below I’ve listed some
reasons, including some insightful comments from scientists
with whom I’ve corresponded about OL training:
(1)
First of all, MICs can build muscle. However, they’re
not all that practical to perform. Absent the proper
equipment you never really know if you are progressively
overloading your muscles from one workout to the next,
and if so, by how much.
(2)
The nervous system may be designed to recruit more
muscle fibers into action when you actually lift a
load than when you perform an isometric action. Read
the related comments provided by well-respected research
scientists Drs. McGill and Burkholder, below.
“Rob,
I have many thoughts on [your points about OL
training an isometrics] but perhaps the simplest
is that you can't activate most of your motor
units with isometric contraction. In the back
for example, a maximum effort deadlift only
produces about 60-65% of the EMG amplitude that
you would get with a much lower load lifted
at speed. So to train all motor units speed
must be involved.”
-Dr.
Stuart McGill (Ph.D.), University of Waterloo
(personal communication, 2004)
|
“Dear
Rob: From a purely muscle point of view, it
probably doesn't make much difference whether
the muscle moves or not during activation (see
Adams, et al., 2004). Similar results have been
seen in humans [lists references]. The trick
is that exercise effects depend not just on
muscle alone, but an interaction among muscle,
neural control, and external physics.
The
nervous system is tuned to the performance of
tasks, not just generation of force, so it can
be easier to get complete recruitment of muscles
if something moves. Psychologically, that motion
is visual feedback that you actually are working,
which can make it easier to continue a training
program.
Force
generation in muscle is also velocity dependent,
so the amount of muscle required to move the
same load depends on how quickly that load is
moved. This offers a much finer degree of control
over the muscle activation than might be achieved
with an isometric workout. Say your one-rep-max
for a particular move is 100 pounds. You might
train by doing sets of 80-90 pounds, and you
can do the first rep faster, which gets maximal
recruitment, but subsequent reps become more
and more slow as fatigue/metabolite depletion
causes some fibers to lose force capacity. As
strength increases, you can increase the speed
of the reps with more control than you can increase
the applied load.
Finally,
if you consider muscle mass and not just girth,
it turns out that muscle can be stimulated to
grow in length as well as diameter. Muscle held
in a lengthened position will increase mass
(length) rapidly. In animal models, using immobilization
to stretch the muscle, this can even lead to
net mass increases at a time when the muscle
girth and force capacity decline rapidly. One
might imagine, then, that generating isometric
tension with the muscles held in their longest
position [as with your Optimal Length Training]
would generate the greatest mass increases-stimulating
both increases in girth and length--but it turns
out that the nervous system inhibits muscle
activation in those extreme positions.”
-Dr.
Thomas Burkholder (Ph.D.), Georgia Institute
of Technology (personal communication, 2004)
|
“Rob,
you have raised an interesting issue and conclusion
regarding training and loading. Yes, I believe
that isometric training would be a great way
to train for muscle enlargement and strength
development. However, I think the issue of isometric
training was washed away with the research of
the 60-70s that basically showed it to be impractical
because of having to perform reps at so many
joint angles to get an effect, the amount of
time required, and the need for equipment; along
with some misinterpretation of data and results.
It’s funny but most conclude that shortening
contractions are superior to isometric for strength
gains, but nothing could be farther from the
truth. Plus, many will confuse the issue by
citing specificity of training which I do not/could
never understand because if you are training
for strength, then using isometric techniques
would be precisely specific.
…The
issue of muscle length is certainly germane,
but I don’t think that the muscle has
to be worked at optimal length to get the effect.
While, isometric force production at optimal
length is the greatest force produced by the
whole muscle; the load/force issue would be
greatest at each muscle length when the force
is produced isometrically; clearly the forces
produced throughout the range of motion of shortening
contractions. Further, there is no doubt about
length-specificity (angle-specificity) to isometric
training and strength gains, although I don’t
know about muscle enlargement, but can’t
see why it would be different. Please note however,
that the issue of muscle length and the concept
of optimal length of isometric contractions
are not directly applicable, nor comparable
to shortening contractions. The value or lack
of value of shortening contractions is more
related to the ultimate force produced rather
than any real muscle length issue.
Another
point, all shortening contractions contain an
isometric component. Therefore, you could argue
that performing shortening contractions at higher
loads would be much more effective than lower
loads for building muscle and strength, yet
most want to perform sets of 8 reps (i.e. low
loads). In fact, once the load beings to move
(muscle shortening) the force does not rise
above that produced during the initial isometric
phase. In essence, the load the muscle sees
and the force produced can not be greater than
the force produced at the onset of muscle shortening
so you could say that the training response
to shortening contractions (lifting barbells)
is determined by the isometric contraction,
hence you are actually performing isometric
contractions. The shortening adds nothing and
is inconsequential to the training response,
except to expose the load (albeit a lesser load
than at the initiation of the contraction) to
the entire range of motion of the muscle. Similar
to what you would accomplish if you were to
perform isometric contractions at 3 or 4 muscle
lengths (joint angles).”
-Dr.
William Brechue (Ph.D.), Indiana University
(personal communication, 2004)
|
(3)
Some scientists whom I’ve spoken with suggest
that the difference in muscle-building signal strength
between a maximal contraction and a near-maximal one
(e.g., 100% and 85% of maximum) may be trivial. This
has not been proven beyond the shadow of a doubt,
mind you. But it does agree reasonably well with ‘the
wisdom of the gym’.
(4)
The ‘wisdom of the gym’ frequently suggests
that the metabolic consequences of force generation
(e.g., muscle fatigue, increased blood flow) may play
a role in stimulating muscle growth. I tend to think
so, as do some scientists I’ve talked to. This
partly explains why R.O.B. (Rest Only Briefly) training
is my favorite muscle-building method. We will discuss
it again briefly below. While MICs can certainly cause
muscle fatigue and increase muscle blood flow, lifting
sub-maximal loads until the point of temporary muscular
failure (or closely thereabouts) may represent a more
effective means to this end.
“Rob,
your reasoning [concerning OL Training] makes
sense to me as I think that force generation
is the primary factor that transmits the signalling
pathway, possibly by turning on IGF-1 to create
an anabolic state in the muscle to increase
positive protein balance in the muscle.
We
have a paper that just came out in the Journal
of Applied Physiology that argues for this as
we induced rodent muscles to first contract
isometrically immediately followed by either
shortening or lengthening actions or continued
isometric actions. The results were that all
three contractions mode induced the same amount
of hypertrophy. Since the isometric mode was
generated in all three modes, I think this is
the essential stimulus.
Interestingly,
even though the lengthening actions produced
more force than the isometric (due to the increased
force imposed on the muscle to break cross bridges),
additional hypertrophy did not occur…”
-Dr.
Kenneth Baldwin (Ph.D.), University of California
at Irvine (personal communication, 2004)
|
“Rob…Many
dynamic resistance exercises include at least
a momentary period of isometric activity. It
may just be possible that this moment of very
high force production before the load is put
into motion may be an important stimulus to
hypertrophy…”
-Dr.
Gregory Adams (Ph.D.), University of California
at Irvine (personal communication, 2004)
|
For
the reasons cited above, including those mentioned
by my scientific friends, coupled with my own personal
experiences, I prefer lifting sub-maximal loads to
performing MICs or purely isometric actions.

End
of Part 1
In Part 2, I will tell you exactly how to incorporate
the OL concept into your own workouts. I’ll
also provide a sample list of OL exercises, complete
with instructions on how to perform them.
In
the mean time, keep visiting www.robthoburn.com
for FREE articles, and to purchase my e-books and
R.O.B. Club forum memberships.
|

10 Quickest Ways to Become More Positive |
 |
by
Dr. Alan Zimmerman
Part
3 of 5
Welcome back. If you’ve read
Parts 1 and 2 of this article, you know that you have
the power to motivate yourself. And you have the power
to accomplish incredible things—if you just
implement a few, simple strategies. I’ve given
you four of the strategies so far. But I think today’s
strategies are especially powerful. So let’s
get started.
5.
Say affirmations.
Somehow or other, every living creature instinctively
knows how to survive. A squirrel, for example, instinctively
knows it had better gather some nuts when autumn comes.
And it doesn’t matter if there are any other
squirrels around, teaching him to perform such a feat.
His instincts tell him to store nuts.
The
same goes for ducks. Even if he lives alone, something
pushes him to fly south when the weather turns cold.
There’s no such thing as duck school teaching
him to start his journey around the tenth of November.
His instincts just tell him what to do and how to
survive.
To
some extent, all living creatures have a bit of instinctual
knowledge. Even human beings know something about
staying alive. Human beings, however, have one major
tool that other creatures do not have. In addition
to survival, human beings can determine, to some extent,
how successful they’re going to be. They can
do that by carefully choosing the words they tell
themselves.
In
fact it’s almost impossible to rise above your
own words. If you tell yourself that you just can’t
do something, you’ll probably be right. And
if you tell yourself you can do it, you’ll also
be right most of the time. It’s called self-talk
or affirmations. It’s making sure that you say
the things you want to become.
Now
that might sound strange. A lot of communication experts
would advise you to say what you mean. And that is
important when it comes to interpersonal relationships.
But when it comes to being a positive person that
has greater and greater amounts of success, it’s
extremely important that you say what you want. You
could tell yourself affirmations as simple as “I
like myself.” The more you say it, the more
you’ll feel it, believe it, and be it. Tell
yourself affirmations such as, “I’m full
of energy… I’ve got enormous amounts of
enthusiasm…I easily maintain my ideal weight…I
am exercising three times a week…and…
I can face all situations with confidence.”
Whatever
you want to become or want to achieve will be facilitated
with the use of affirmations.
The famous engineer, Charles Kettering, learned about
this several years ago. He knew that the focus of
your mind determines the results of your behavior.
So he explained the process to his friend Joe.
Joe was skeptical. So Charles made a bet with him.
He said he would buy a beautiful birdcage for his
friend, who would hang it in the living room. He bet
that Joe would have to put a bird in the cage. Joe
took the bet, thinking it would be an easy bet to
win.
Three
months went by, during which time Joe had a large
number of visitors. They all came into the living
room, and, of course they immediately asked, “Where’s
the bird, Joe?”
Joe explained that he had never had a bird. They didn’t
believe him. They said, “Joe, nobody has a beautiful
birdcage like that without a bird in it!”
At
night, Joe kept dreaming about their comment. Over
and over he heard them say, “Nobody has a birdcage
without a bird in it!” He kept thinking about
it, until one day he found himself driving by a pet
store. He peeked in the window. And as you can guess,
when Charles came back to visit his friend, Joe had
a beautiful bird in the beautiful birdcage. A very
similar thing happens when you tell yourself positive
affirmations. You are hanging empty birdcages in your
mind. And you’re not content until you fill
the birdcage with belief and action.
I can’t overemphasize this point. If you want
to become a more positive person, you must spend a
few minutes a day telling yourself positive affirmations.
It’s absolutely critical. That’s why I
produced a 6-pack CD album on the subject, outlining
what you should say as well as how and when you should
say your affirmations. And as a reader of Lee Labrada’s
newsletter, you can get a copy of the album at a major
discount. Just
click here to find out more.
A
healthy person spends a few minutes a day exercising
and feeding his body. And a truly positive person
spends a few minutes a day feeding his mind the affirmations
it needs. Make sure you do it.
6.
Establish some positive triggers.
Positive people live in the same world that negative
people do. They both get exposed to thousands of words,
images, and situations every day, and often times
they get exposed to the same things. The difference
is that positive people have established a number
of triggers that ignite a positive response inside
themselves.
Zig Ziglar gives a somewhat comical example. He talks
about the stoplights at intersections all across the
country. Most people, he says, have turned them into
negatives. They come up to a red light and begin to
grumble about the inconvenience. They’re mildly
upset.
But
think about, Mr. Ziglar says. Those “stop lights”
are far from being a negative. They’re really
“go lights.” You know that whenever one
of those lights didn’t work, traffic was backed
up in all directions. So the light is truly a positive,
because when they’re working you go faster and
more safely to your destination.
Ziglar says you should look at every traffic light
as a positive. Whenever you see one, think, “Great!
Someone was concerned with my safety and the smooth
flow of traffic. Now isn’t that wonderful!”
Of
course it may sound a little crazy, but his point
is well taken. You need some things in your daily
life that will trigger an automatic positive response.
And the more you have the more positive you’ll
become.
Some people carry a little cross or a religious symbol
in their pocket. Whenever they reach in and feel it,
they’re reminded of the positive benefits of
their faith.
Some
people look for smiles. Whenever they see someone
smiling on the street, in a passing car, or down the
hallway at work, they put a smile on their face. Go
ahead and establish some positive triggers that you
can use each and every day. When those triggers occur,
think a positive thought or make a positive comment.
Your triggers might include such things as certain
landmarks on the way to work or those moments when
a commercial comes on the radio or television. It
doesn’t matter. Just make sure you establish
some positive triggers and use them.
That’s
it for today. I’ll give you some more quick
ways to become a more positive person in upcoming
articles. But I encourage you to sign up for your
FREE subscription to my weekly internet newsletter
called “Dr. Zimmerman’s Tuesday Tip.”
And when you do sign up, I’ll send you a FREE
book and a $10 coupon. All you have to do is go to
www.DrZimmerman.com where you’ll find the sign
up details.

Dr.
Alan Zimmerman is one of most sought-after motivational
speakers in America, and a recent inductee into the
CPAE Speaker Hall of Fame.
To
contact Alan, visit www.drzimmerman.com
|

Slim
Your Waist, Not Your Wallet This Winter
Do
you know what time of the year is hardest for staying
in shape? Let me put it this way...Santa's never had a
six-pack. And neither will you, if you let the cheer of
the holiday season put a damper on your discipline. But
there's good news - I have a way for you to keep up on
the supplements you need to stay in great shape, and save
some money in the process!
Check
out our Web Specials page for our excellent Winter Specials.
They'll provide you with the muscle-building and fat-burning
tools you need to keep fit this winter - so you won't
have to waste that New Year's Resolution on "I will
lose that extra ten pounds I put on after Thanksgiving."
These specials make a great gift idea for the fitness
enthusiast in your life. Plus, we're offering such great
prices, your holiday budget will stay slim as well.
Now
Available Online - Check Out Our Web Specials Today.
Until
Next Week, I am

Your Lean Body Coach
©2004
- Lee Labrada. All rights reserved.
|